Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your First To File And First To Invent shopping experience:
1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the First To File And First To Invent offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of First To File And First To Invent at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.
2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about
3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a First To File And First To Invent? Wrong! If the First To File And First To Invent is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.
4. Questions - Got a question about First To File And First To Invent then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....
5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling First To File And First To Invent? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about First To File And First To Invent and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.
6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your First To File And First To Invent wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.
7. Feedback - happy with your First To File And First To Invent then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.
8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the First To File And First To Invent site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site
9. Contact - got a question about First To File And First To Invent, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.
10. Payment - ready to pay for your First To File And First To Invent, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.
First to file and
first to invent are legal concepts that define who has the right to the grant of a
patent for an invention. The first to file system is used in the majority of countries, with the notable exception of the
United States, which operates a first to invent system.
First to file
In a first to file system, the right to the grant of a patent for a given invention lies with the first person to file a patent application for protection of that invention, regardless of the date of actual invention.
First to invent
The United States uses a
first-to-invent system, unlike most other countries in the world. Invention in the U.S. is generally defined to comprise two steps: (1) conception of the invention and (2) reduction to practice of the invention. When an inventor conceives of an invention and
diligently reduces the invention to practice (by filing a patent application, by practicing the invention, etc), the inventor's date of invention will be the date of conception. Thus, provided an inventor is diligent in reducing an application to practice, he or she will be the first inventor and the inventor entitled to a patent, even if another files a patent application (reduces the invention to practice) before the inventor.http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/2100_2138_05.htm
However, the first applicant to file has the
prima facie right to the grant of a patent. Should a second patent application be filed for the same invention, the second applicant can institute interference proceedings to determine who was the first inventor (as discussed in the preceding paragraph) and thereby who is entitled to the grant of a patent. This can be an expensive and time-consuming process.
Example
Assume Tom conceives of a new mousetrap on January 1, 2006. Tom works diligently from January 1, 2006, to February 1, 2006, to prepare a patent application, and Tom files his patent application on February 1, 2006. Thus, Tom reduced his invention to practice on February 1, 2006. Assume Jerry conceives of the same mousetrap on January 10, 2006, and diligently files a patent application on the new mousetrap on January 20, 2006. Tom is entitled to the patent on the mousetrap, because he conceived of the mousetrap before Jerry and worked diligently to reduce it to practice.http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/0700_715_07.htm#sect715.07. The USPTO would institute an interference proceeding between Tom and Jerry to review evidence of conception and diligence.
As a further extension of this example, assume Tweedy conceived of the same mousetrap on December 31, 1990. Tweedy never told anyone about the mousetrap and did not work on reducing the mousetrap to practice for many years due to financial reasons. Tweedy finally reduces the mousetrap to practice on February 15, 2006. Tweedy did not diligently work to reduce the invention to practice, so he is not entitled to a patent over Tom or Jerry.http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/0700_715_07_a.htm#sect715.07a This is one of many reasons why patent attorneys advise clients to file patent applications as soon as possible.
See also
- List of patent legal concepts
- Submarine patent
- Inventor's notebook
References
- From First-to-Invent to First-to-File: The Canadian Experience, Robin Coster, American Intellectual Property Law Association, April 2002.
- First-to-file or First-to-invent?, Charles L. Gholz, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 82 JPTOS 891, December 2000.
- First to Invent vs. First to File, Inventors Assistance League. Advocates first-to-invent.
- 1992 Special Summary Report; The Great Debate; First-to-invent vs. First-to-file and the International Harmonization Treaty, Stephen Gnass/Inventors Voice. Advocates first-to-invent as more friendly to the individual inventor.
First to file and
first to invent are legal concepts that define who has the right to the grant of a patent for an invention. The first to file system is used in the majority of countries, with the notable exception of the United States, which operates a first to invent system.
First to file
In a first to file system, the right to the grant of a patent for a given invention lies with the first person to file a patent application for protection of that invention, regardless of the date of actual invention.
First to invent
The United States uses a
first-to-invent system, unlike most other countries in the world. Invention in the U.S. is generally defined to comprise two steps: (1) conception of the invention and (2) reduction to practice of the invention. When an inventor conceives of an invention and
diligently reduces the invention to practice (by filing a patent application, by practicing the invention, etc), the inventor's date of invention will be the date of conception. Thus, provided an inventor is diligent in reducing an application to practice, he or she will be the first inventor and the inventor entitled to a patent, even if another files a patent application (reduces the invention to practice) before the inventor.http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/2100_2138_05.htm
However, the first applicant to file has the
prima facie right to the grant of a patent. Should a second patent application be filed for the same invention, the second applicant can institute interference proceedings to determine who was the first inventor (as discussed in the preceding paragraph) and thereby who is entitled to the grant of a patent. This can be an expensive and time-consuming process.
Example
Assume Tom conceives of a new
mousetrap on January 1, 2006. Tom works diligently from January 1, 2006, to February 1, 2006, to prepare a patent application, and Tom files his patent application on February 1, 2006. Thus, Tom reduced his invention to practice on February 1, 2006. Assume Jerry conceives of the same mousetrap on January 10, 2006, and diligently files a patent application on the new mousetrap on January 20, 2006. Tom is entitled to the patent on the mousetrap, because he conceived of the mousetrap before Jerry and worked diligently to reduce it to practice.http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/0700_715_07.htm#sect715.07. The USPTO would institute an interference proceeding between Tom and Jerry to review evidence of conception and diligence.
As a further extension of this example, assume Tweedy conceived of the same mousetrap on December 31, 1990. Tweedy never told anyone about the mousetrap and did not work on reducing the mousetrap to practice for many years due to financial reasons. Tweedy finally reduces the mousetrap to practice on February 15, 2006. Tweedy did not diligently work to reduce the invention to practice, so he is not entitled to a patent over Tom or Jerry.http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/0700_715_07_a.htm#sect715.07a This is one of many reasons why patent attorneys advise clients to file patent applications as soon as possible.
See also
References
- From First-to-Invent to First-to-File: The Canadian Experience, Robin Coster, American Intellectual Property Law Association, April 2002.
- First-to-file or First-to-invent?, Charles L. Gholz, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 82 JPTOS 891, December 2000.
- First to Invent vs. First to File, Inventors Assistance League. Advocates first-to-invent.
- 1992 Special Summary Report; The Great Debate; First-to-invent vs. First-to-file and the International Harmonization Treaty, Stephen Gnass/Inventors Voice. Advocates first-to-invent as more friendly to the individual inventor.
